Israel Affairs, Volume 22, Issue 2, April 2016 is now available online on Taylor & Francis Online. This new issue contains the following articles: How do states die: lessons for Israel
Steven R. David Pages: 270-290 | DOI: 10.1080/13537121.2016.1140358Towards a biblical psychology for modern Israel: 10 guides for healthy living Kalman J. Kaplan Pages: 291-317 | DOI: 10.1080/13537121.2016.1140349 The past as a yardstick: Europeans, Muslim migrants and the onus of European-Jewish histories The mental cleavage of Israeli politics Framing policy paradigms: population dispersal and the Gaza withdrawal National party strategies in local elections: a theory and some evidence from the Israeli case ‘I have two homelands’: constructing and managing Iranian Jewish and Persian Israeli identities Avoiding longing: the case of ‘hidden children’ in the Holocaust ‘Are you being served?’ The Jewish Agency and the absorption of Ethiopian immigration | The danger of Israel according to Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi Leisure in the twenty-first century: the case of Israel Limits to cooperation: why Israel does not want to become a member of the International Energy Agency The attitude of the local press to marginal groups: between solidarity and alienation The construction of Israeli ‘masculinity’ in the sports arena Holocaust images and picturing catastrophe: the cultural politics of seeing |
Tag Archives: Energy Market
New Article: Haber, Social Regulation in Utilities in Israel
Haber, Hanan. “Rise of the Regulatory Welfare State? Social Regulation in Utilities in Israel.” Social Policy & Administration (early view; online first).
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/spol.12194
Abstract
This article explores the relation between economic liberalization, regulation and welfare. It asks how the state regulates, delays or prevents service disconnection due to debt and arrears, and what this kind of policy implies regarding the use of regulation as a form of social policy. This is done through a comparative study of the electricity and water sectors in Israel after liberalization. It finds that after initial economic reform, both sectors saw a growth in regulation intended to compensate for the social effects of reform, in what may be termed the ‘regulatory welfare state’. However, this form of social protection has been residual and incoherent. The article argues that trying to separate economic reform from its social consequences is unrealistic and may lead to adverse social and economic results. Second, findings raise concerns regarding the potential of the regulatory welfare state to deliver effective and fair social policy.